The person who wrote it doesn't understand Wikipedia very well. He or she may be sincere, but the facts that have been misconstrued make the situation appear worse than it is.
Take the Norman Finkelstein example. The author points to WikiProject Palestine
In its hall of fame for best articles, the Palestine Project page lists four best biographies. One is by Norman Finkelstein, a staunch supporter of the Palestinian cause, whose controversial bestseller "The Holocaust Industry" accused Jews of exploiting the Holocaust for financial and political gain.
What actually happened was WikiProject Palestine volunteers worked on the Finkelstein biography: they improved that page enough that it passed independent review for neutrality, referencing, comprehensiveness, and other standards required for Wikipedia's formal designation as a "good article".
This doesn't mean Norman Finkelstein is a good guy or Norman Finkelstein should be cited as much as possible. It means Wikipedia has a good biography of this fellow. And it makes sense to prioritize a well-written biography for a controversial figure, because good article status means more volunteers watch the page. Thorough referencing and and more eyes watching the article make it resistant to ideological manipulation of any variety.
Love him or hate him, Norman Finkelstein is a living person. Wikipedia does its best to see that living people's biographies are handled with due care. Our pages usually rank very high on search engines--often higher than the subject's own personal site--and we want to offer a fair presentation of reliably verified data.
Of course there are problems with editorial disputes between editors in the Israeli-Palestinian debates, and despite the recent CAMERA news as reported by Electronic Intifada, I doubt the policy violations are entirely on the side of Israel's sympathizers. If you're going to make accusations, though, it's important to to have rigorous research and documentation. There might be a good case to be made about manipulative action by Palestinian sympathizers, but a superficial critique of the Norman Finkelstein biography isn't it.
I'll repost a statement I made last month while the CAMERA incident unfolded:
Statement of principle
- Wikipedia exists to reflect expert opinion, not to shape public opinion.
- Wikipedia seeks to be neutral and values editors who set aside personal creeds when they contribute.
- Deliberate manipulation of content in pursuit of any ideology damages the project.
- Coordinated campaigns of manipulation strike at the heart of this site's purpose and its goal of credibility.
- We Wikipedians promise to halt all coordinated manipulation that we are able to adequately verify, regardless of its motive or purpose.
- We also promise to balance this effort with appropriate restraint and good faith.
- We promise to pursue these matters without reference to our own beliefs.
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and we intend to keep it one.
Editors who wish to work toward improvements in a bipartisan setting are welcome to check out WikiProject Israel Palestine collaboration.
This is the home page of '''WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration''', a bipartisan effort to improve collaboration on and coverage of Israeli-Palestinian topics. This project has been inspired by the Sri Lankan reconciliation project.لسلام عليكم
Peace be with you.