69:
- 1 to propose the change
- 5 to support
- 1 to dispute whether the change is a needed process
- 7 more to pile on from IRC and join the dispute
- 2 to open a request for comment
- 37 to vote at the straw poll
- 5 to say votes are evil
- 1 to MFD it
- 9 to object until the MFD gets speedily closed
- 1 to mark the proposal historical.
Afterward on AN, all opposers claim the consensus favored darkness.
----
Thanks to Xavexgoem and Dendodge for the brainstorm.
Posts
7 comments:
absolutely brilliant :-)
kekekekekekekekekekekeke
Actually, I think that 69 is an underestimate. Changing Wikipedia appears to be a very tedious, long, slow process.
LOL :)
But did the bulb got changed?
The proposal to change the status quo of darkness failed to achieve community support.
an alternative version
http://www.madsgormlarsen.dk/2008/10/11/how-many-wikipedians-does-it-take-to-change-a-light-bulb/
An alternative version
http://www.madsgormlarsen.dk/2008/10/11/how-many-wikipedians-does-it-take-to-change-a-light-bulb/
Post a Comment