tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12886811.post950481000034163197..comments2024-03-06T19:01:26.120-08:00Comments on Durova: You and me baby ain't nothing but mammalsLise Broerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15087397520904837725noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12886811.post-31038632595677904542008-07-02T14:56:00.000-07:002008-07-02T14:56:00.000-07:00Durova, this is indeed an interesting point and so...Durova, this is indeed an interesting point and something worthy of exploration. I wonder, though, whether "Featured image" status is really the issue at hand.<BR/><BR/>I don't think the Wikipedia is well-equipped to make such fine distinctions, or that it's appropriate to expect that. The level of concern you show seems to me more appropriate to <I>whether or not the image is included in the project at all</I>, rather than whether or not it's featured.<BR/><BR/>So I'd say you've made the beginnings of a good argument for IfD; I think it's fine that the argument arose out of a Featured Image discussion, but ultimately I'd say that if an image is allowed on Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons -- IF being the operative word -- that these sort of concerns should not prevent it from being Featured.<BR/><BR/>After all, anyone can pubish a freely licensed image anywhere they want...Wikipedia is not the only site that gets 20 million page views.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com